Cases 61 - 70 of 2,247
(HC) Cross v. Kings County Sheriff
as 1:2023cv01246
Petitioner:
Jerome Lee Cross
Respondent:
Kings County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Castillo v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II
as 5:2023cv00525
Petitioner:
Charlie Henry Castillo, Charles Henry Castillo and Joe King
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
King v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2023cv23118
Petitioner:
William C. King
Defendant:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections and Attorney General of the State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2023cv01776
Petitioner:
Rodolfo King Jones
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Darrell King v. Warden
as 2:2023cv06444
Petitioner:
Darrell King
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Sammie King, Jr. v. Dooly SP Warden
as 23-12500
Petitioner / Appellant:
SAMMIE DAVIS KING, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
DOOLY SP WARDEN
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Robert Via, Jr. v. Harold Clarke
as 23-6732
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROBERT KING VIA, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of VA-DOC
Walker #747025 v. King
as 1:2023cv00782
Petitioner:
Larry Walker #747025
Respondent:
Chris King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
King v. Lumpkin
as 23-50512
Petitioner / Appellant:
Billy Joe King
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
King v. Paul, Warden
as 5:2023cv00207
Petitioner:
Daaron Edward King
Respondent:
David Paul, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
