Cases 81 - 90 of 101
Smith v. Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution
as 3:2009cv00097
Petitioner:
Robert S Smith, Jr
Respondent:
Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Smith v. Anderson
as 6:2009cv03027
Petitioner:
Robert Junior Smith
Respondent:
Marty Anderson and Marty Anderson
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Smith v. Phelps et al
as 1:2009cv00002
Petitioner:
Robert L. Smith
Respondent:
Perry Phelps and Attorney General of State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Stanley Williams v. Robert Smith
as 08-8340
Petitioner - Appellant:
STANLEY LORENZO WILLIAMS
Respondent - Appellee:
ROBERT W. SMITH and THEODIS BECK
Smith v. Crist
as 2:2008cv14358
Plaintiff:
Robert J. Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Charlie Crist
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Smith v. Cain et al
as 3:2008cv00655
Petitioner:
Robert A. Smith
Respondent:
Burl Cain and James D. Caldwell
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jones v Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 5:2008cv00006
Petitioner:
Michael NMN Jones
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Keith Roy, Patricia M Anthony and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
McDonald v. Warden Lebanon Correctional Institution
as 3:2008cv01718
Petitioner:
Dewitt McDonald, Jr.
Intervenor:
Erie County Prosecutor's Office
Respondent:
Warden Lebanon Correctional Institution
Amicus Curiae:
Robert T. Smith and Southern Christian Leadership Conference
Interested Party:
BCI&I
Not Classified By Court:
Sandusky Register
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robert Smith v. State of North Carolina
as 08-7210
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT EUGENE SMITH
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Smith v. McDaniel et al
as 3:2008cv00335
Petitioner:
Robert Anthony Smith
Respondent:
E.K. McDaniel and The Attorney General Of The State Of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
