Cases 1 - 10 of 95
Dayton #355356 v. Thornell et al
as 4:2024cv00257
Petitioner:
Robert Guy Dayton, Jr.
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell, Staci Ibarra and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ibarra-Gonzalez v. El Pueblo de Puerto Rico
as 3:2023cv01575
Plaintiff:
Moises Ibarra-Gonzalez
Defendant:
El Pueblo de Puerto Rico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ibarra-Medina v. Warden of USP Thomson
as 1:2023cv15066
Petitioner:
Ibarra Medina Armando and Armando Ibarra-Medina
Respondent:
Warden of USP Thomson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Armando v. Warden of USP Thomson
as 4:2023cv04177
Petitioner:
Ibarra Medina Armando
Respondent:
Warden of USP Thomson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ibarra v. Cox
as 2:2023cv00052
Petitioner:
Cesar Alejandro Ibarra
Respondent:
J.W. Cox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Garcia-Ibarra v. Stephenson et al
as 2:2023cv00108
Petitioner:
Eugenio Garcia-Ibarra
Respondent:
George Stephenson and Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ogle v. Thornell et al
as 2:2023cv00200
Petitioner:
Jessie Paul Ogle
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell, Staci Ibarra and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ibarra v. Shinn et al
as 4:2019cv00447
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan, Arizona Attorney General and David Shinn
Petitioner:
Eric Ibarra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ibarra v. Uttecht
as 2:2019cv00205
Petitioner:
Carlos E Ibarra
Respondent:
State of Washington and Jeffery A Uttecht
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ibarra v. Johns
as 5:2019cv00015
Petitioner:
Marcelo Hernandez Ibarra
Respondent:
Tracy Johns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
