Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Tiffany Roberts v. Staff Attorney 4, et al
as 23-12976
Petitioner / Appellant:
TIFFANY ROBIN ROBERTS
Respondent / Appellee:
STAFF ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, SCOTT ANDERSON, D A, GARRICK VICKERY, Prosecutor and others
ARCHER v. NICHOLAS et al
as 2:2023cv00898
Petitioner:
JESSICA ARCHER
Respondent:
WENDY NICHOLAS and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF FAYETTE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Evans v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2023cv00111
Plaintiff:
Archer Lee Evans
Defendant:
TDCJ, Director Bobby Lumpkin and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Evans v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv01735
Petitioner:
Archer Lee Evans
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James Archer v. Superintendent Rockview SCI, et al
as 23-1775
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES E. ARCHER
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Archer v. Supreme Court of the State of Montana et al
as 2:2022cv00083
Petitioner:
Maurice Ronald Archer
Respondent:
Supreme Court of the State of Montana and State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GIBSON v. PISTRO et al
as 5:2022cv00243
Petitioner:
SHAWN D GIBSON
Respondent:
KENIN D PISTRO and KENDES ARCHER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Roberts v. Anderson et al
as 5:2020cv00795
Respondent:
Scott Anderson, Garrick Vickery, Byron Williams and others
Petitioner:
Tiffany Robin Roberts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Archer v. Hammers et al
as 1:2020cv02592
Petitioner:
Lavalle Archer
Respondent:
Justin Hammers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Amin v. Crawford et al
as 2:2019cv00396
Respondent:
Ron Vitiello, Marlen Piniero, Nathalies Archer and others
Petitioner:
Harsil Dikulkumar Amin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
