Cases 1 - 10 of 226
Francis v. Schlax et al
as 3:2025cv00004
Petitioner:
Charles Francis
Respondent:
Judge M. Borrello, Naphcare Techcare, Judge A. Borrello and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Day v. Calloway
as 1:2024cv00485
Respondent:
Rolanda Calloway
Petitioner:
Okoye Day
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Primes v. Cueva
as 2:2024cv03018
Petitioner:
Otis Day Primes
Respondent:
Cueva
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sanchez-Rodriguez v. Day
as 24-30516
Petitioner:
Jorge Sanchez-Rodriguez
Respondent:
Travis Day, Warden, B. B. Rayburn Correctional Center
Joshua Day v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-12574
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Petitioner:
JOSHUA LEE DAY
Day #342738 v. Thornell et al
as 3:2024cv08141
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell, Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Kristian Mayes
Petitioner:
Donnie Guy Day
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Day v. Foley et al
as 2:2024cv04094
Defendant:
Trevor Foley and Julie Kempker
Plaintiff:
Lewis Eugene Day
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Avist v. Day et al
as 2:2024cv01185
Plaintiff:
Christopher Avist
Defendant:
Travis Day
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anderson v. Day
as 2:2024cv00873
Plaintiff:
Donald Arthur Anderson
Defendant:
Travis Day
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ross v. Day et al
as 2:2024cv00740
Plaintiff:
Frederick Ross
Defendant:
Travis Day
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
