Cases 1 - 10 of 131
Guevara v. Rowe
as 5:2024cv00128
Petitioner:
Rogelio Guevara
Respondent:
Kelly S. Rowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Case Opened in Error
as 5:2024hc02079
Defendant:
Gloria Rangel Gonzales
Respondent:
Sheriff Willie Rowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rangel Gonzales v. Rowe
as 5:2024hc02080
Petitioner:
Gloria Rangel Gonzales
Respondent:
Sheriff Willie Rowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Holtzinger v. Rowe
as 1:2024cv00788
Petitioner:
Patrick Landon Holtzinger
Respondent:
Major Craig Rowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rowe v. Wagner
as 3:2024cv05196
Petitioner:
Anthony C Rowe
Respondent:
Jack Wagner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Heath v. Rowe
as 2:2024cv00089
Petitioner:
Secial Heath
Defendant:
Larry Rowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Meares v. Rowe
as 5:2023cv00297
Petitioner:
Michael Meares
Respondent:
Kelly Rowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Moore v. Lubbock County Detention Center, et al
as 5:2023cv00290
Plaintiff:
Stormy Moore
Defendant:
Lubbock County Police Station, Jordan Keith Freeman and C. Lockerd
Respondent:
Lubbock County Detention Center and Kelly Rowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Miller v. Lubbock County Sheriff
as 5:2023cv00279
Petitioner:
Benjamin Miller
Respondent:
Lubbock County Sheriff and Kelly Rowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Rowe v. Andrewjeski et al
as 3:2023cv05875
Plaintiff:
Timothy Peter Joseph Rowe
Respondent:
Melissa Andrewjeski and Bob Ferguson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
