Cases 1 - 10 of 2,964
Dent v. Adams
as 1:2024cv02453
Petitioner:
Terrance Dent
Respondent:
Robert Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adames v. Dotson
as 2:2024cv00352
Petitioner:
Alexander Adames
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Salsman v. Adams et al
as 1:2024cv00911
Petitioner:
Chad Michael Salsman
Respondent:
Superintendent Melinda Adams, Michelle A. Henry, Esquire and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Duncan v. Adams
as 4:2024cv00778
Petitioner:
Barrett N. Duncan
Respondent:
Richard Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RUNSDORF v. PENSACOLA FPC
as 3:2024cv00242
Petitioner:
ADAM P RUNSDORF
Respondent:
PENSACOLA FPC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Adams v. Wyoming Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-8039
Petitioner:
JETT GARRIOTT ADAMS
Respondent:
WYOMING DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and WYOMING ATTORNEY GENERAL
Martin v. Warden USP McCreary
as 3:2024cv00315
Petitioner:
Adam Eugene Martin
Respondent:
Warden USP McCreary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Williams, Jr. v. Ogle et al
as 4:2024cv00853
Petitioner:
Sylvester Williams, Jr.
Respondent:
Adam Ogle and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hale v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Putnam)
as 3:2024cv00533
Petitioner:
Adam Hale
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams, Jr. v. Ogle et al
as 4:2024cv00817
Petitioner:
Sylvester Williams, Jr.
Respondent:
Adam Ogle and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
