General Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Lamarr Blunt v. Chris Stevens
as 24-1074
Petitioner: LAMARR D. BLUNT
Respondent: CHRIS STEVENS
Blunt v. Stevens We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv01533
Petitioner: Lamarr Deprice Blunt
Respondent: Warden Christopher Stevens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Blunt v. Hooper et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv01492
Plaintiff: Terrance Blunt
Defendant: Tim Hooper
Respondent: Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Blunt v. Ma'at We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv00180
Defendant: Sanjat Ma'at
Plaintiff: Byron Blunt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Blunt v. State of Mississippi
as 3:2020cv00820
Plaintiff: Charlie Blunt
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Defendant: State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Blunt v. Davis
as 4:2019cv04145
Respondent: Lorie Davis
Petitioner: Lamonn Eugene Blunt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Blunt v. Morris
as 3:2018cv00713
Plaintiff: Charlie Blunt
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Defendant: Warden Timothy Morris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BLUNT v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv13950
Respondent: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and WILLIE BONDS
Petitioner: CURTIS BLUNT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Charlie Blunt v. Georgia Shelby, et al
as 18-60513
Petitioner - Appellant: CHARLIE BLUNT
Respondent - Appellee: GEORGIA SHELBY, Warden, South Mississippi Correctional Institution and RON KING, Superintendent
BLUNT v. GOVERNOR et al
as 9:2018cv00603
Petitioner: Samuel Blunt
Respondent: GOVERNOR, ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA TOWN OF RALEIGH, SHERIFF OFFICE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?