Cases 1 - 10 of 261
Louis Bradshaw v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 24-11129
Petitioner:
LOUIS LEE BRADSHAW
Defendant:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
(HC) Ramirez v. Aguilar et al
as 1:2023cv01538
Petitioner:
Narciso Ramirez
Respondent:
Mark S. Aguilar, Judge David Wolf, Judge Eric Bradshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bradshaw v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 1:2023cv23783
Plaintiff:
Louis Lee Bradshaw
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bradshaw v. Garrett
as 2:2023cv00170
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bradshaw
Defendant:
Doe and Chad Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Bradshaw v. Lumpkin
as 4:2022cv02826
Petitioner:
Dewayne Bradshaw
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bernal v. Bradshaw
as 9:2022cv80732
Plaintiff:
Adrian M. Bernal
Defendant:
Ric L. Bradshaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bradshaw v. Lumpkin
as 22-50324
Petitioner / Appellant:
Charlton Ellison Bradshaw
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
John Sochor v. Kenneth Bradshaw, et al
as 22-15580
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN GABRIEL SOCHOR
Respondent / Appellee:
KENNETH BRADSHAW and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Sochor v. Bradshaw et al
as 4:2022cv00160
Petitioner:
John Gabriel Sochor
Respondent:
Kenneth Bradshaw and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bradshaw v. Lumpkin
as 5:2022cv00325
Petitioner:
Charlton Ellison Bradshaw
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
