Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Christiansen v. Municipality of Adams County Combined Court Justice Center et al
as 1:2019cv00646
Respondent:
No Named Respondents
Plaintiff:
Steven Christiansen and Steven-Shiloi Christiansen
Defendant:
Municipality of Adams County Combined Court Justice Center, Treatment and Evaluations Services, Municipality of the State if the District Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st
Irizarry v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2018cv04961
Defendant:
Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Disabilities, Rockdale County, Rockdale County District Attorney and others
Plaintiff:
Omar Irizarry
Respondent:
Judy Fitzgerald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Riojas v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2018cv00481
Respondent:
US Senators, Correct Care Solutions/Medical League Concepts, Secretary of State of Washington DC and others
Petitioner:
Ricardo Riojas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Perry v. Correct Care Solutions, LLC, et. al.
as 1:2017cv00664
Petitioner:
Gregory Perry
Respondent:
Correct Care Solutions, LLC, et. al.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Blackburn v. Kentucky State Reformatory et al
as 3:2017cv00019
Petitioner:
Jonah Blackburn
Respondent:
Kentucky State Reformatory, Aaron Smith, Correct Care Solution and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
James Muhammad v. Correct Care Solution
as 15-8035
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES MUHAMMAD, a/k/a Ahmad Muhammad-Ali
Respondent - Appellee:
CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS and CHIEF MCCLEASE
Muhammad v. Correct Care Solutions et al
as 1:2015cv04513
Petitioner:
James Muhammad
Respondent:
Correct Care Solutions and Chief McClease
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Parrish-Parrado v. Rohling et al
as 5:2008cv03219
Petitioner:
Daniel Joseph Parrish-Parrado
Respondent:
Karen Rohling, Larned Correctional Facility, Lansing Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
