General Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 19
David Thomas v. Kenneth Jones, et al
as 17-11109
Petitioner - Appellant: DAVID MATTHEW THOMAS
Respondent - Appellee: KENNETH JONES and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
McKinney v. Walrath et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv00103
Petitioner: David Matthew McKinney
Respondent: John Walrath, Harold W. Clark and Mark Herring
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Miller v. State of Florida
as 6:2016cv01372
Petitioner: David Matthew Miller
Respondent: State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jones v. Ball We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00326
Petitioner: David Matthew Jones
Respondent: Mike Ball
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Holz v. Broadhead et al
as 3:2014cv08138
Petitioner: David Matthew Folsom Holz
Respondent: Lyle Broadhead and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thomas v. Jones et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv00431
Petitioner: David Matthew Thomas
Respondent: Kenneth Jones and The Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Van Wormer v. Clarke
as 1:2013cv01496
Petitioner: David Matthew Van Wormer
Respondent: Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kenny v. Paramo et al
as 3:2013cv00079
Petitioner: David Matthew Kenny
Respondent: Daniel Paramo and Kamala D. Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kenny v. Paramo We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv02753
Petitioner: David Matthew Kenny
Respondent: Daniel Paramo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Layton v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv00139
Petitioner: David Matthew Layton
Respondent: Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?