Cases 1 - 10 of 362
Carroll v. Mississippi Dept. of Corr. Records Dept.
as 3:2024cv00184
Plaintiff:
Wiley Zachary Carroll
Defendant:
Mississippi Dept. of Corr. Records Dept. and Superintendent John Hunt
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hunt v. State of Maryland et al
as 1:2024cv00888
Petitioner:
Kareem Eugene Hunt
Defendant:
State of Maryland and Warden William Bailey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hunt v. Anderson
as 3:2024cv00202
Petitioner:
Floyd O. Hunt, Jr.
Respondent:
D. Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Raymond Hunt v. E. J. Borla
as 2:2024cv00872
Petitioner:
Raymond Hunt
Respondent:
E. J. Borla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hunt v. Ishee
as 5:2024hc02003
Petitioner:
Michael Eugene Hunt
Respondent:
Todd Ishee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
HUNT v. CASTRO et al
as 5:2023cv00320
Petitioner:
DERRICK MARTIN HUNT
Respondent:
M CASTRO, PATRICK LABAT, FANI WILLIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hunt v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 3:2023cv00774
Plaintiff:
Floyd O. Hunt, Jr.
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hunt v. State of Florida
as 8:2023cv02279
Petitioner:
Jason Randall Hunt
Defendant:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hunt v. Miller
as 2:2023cv00854
Petitioner:
Kenneth Eric Hunt
Respondent:
Jamie Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hunt v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00192
Petitioner:
David Hunt
Respondent:
Warden Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
