Cases 1 - 10 of 104
Hanks v. Greene
as 1:2024cv07553
Respondent:
Brittany Greene
Petitioner:
Edward Hanks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hatcher v. State of TN et al
as 3:2024cv00583
Petitioner:
Henry Roosevelt Hatcher, III and Hank Gunther
Respondent:
State of TN, Metro and Emma l/n/u
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Holloway v. Hanks
as 22-1931
Petitioner / Appellant:
DALE E. HOLLOWAY, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
HELEN HANKS, Commissioner, New Hampshire Department of Corrections
Arkulari v. Sabatka-Rine
as 8:2022cv00395
Petitioner:
Hank Arkulari
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General's Office
Respondent:
Diane Sabatka-Rine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perfetto v. Hanks
as 22-1487
Petitioner / Appellant:
JONATHAN ANDREW PERFETTO
Respondent / Appellee:
HELEN HANKS, Commissioner, New Hampshire Department of Corrections
Hanks v. Christensen
as 1:2021cv00292
Petitioner:
Melvin Dean Hanks
Respondent:
Jay Christensen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Beebe v. Hanks, et al(Pinellas County)
as 8:2020cv02134
Petitioner:
Steven Beebe
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections, Attorney General, State of Florida and Craig Hanks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Perry v. Tennessee, State of et al
as 3:2019cv01011
Respondent:
House Committee of Congress, Charles Kalpatrick, Tennessee, State of and others
Petitioner:
Courtney Perry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
(HC) Hanks v. Clark
as 1:2019cv01412
Petitioner:
Jonathan Marzette Hanks
Respondent:
Ken Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Waymer et al v. Reed Eddy et al
as 1:2019cv01465
Petitioner:
Mustafa Allah Waymer, Frederick Banks, Hamana and others
Respondent:
University of North Carolina, Hank County Jail Sheriff, FBI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
