General Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Hargrove v. Warden Healy
as 4:2023cv01857
Petitioner: Terrell Anthony Hargrove
Respondent: Warden Ian Healy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hargrove v. Labat et al
as 1:2022cv00932
Petitioner: Daniel P. Hargrove
Respondent: Sheriff Labat and Governor Kemp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Daniel Hargrove v. Sheriff, et al
as 22-10446
Petitioner / Appellant: DANIEL P. HARGROVE
Respondent / Appellee: JUDGE OLIVER, GOVERNOR OF GEORGIA, STATE OF GEORGIA and others
Hargrove v. State of GA et al
as 1:2022cv00392
Petitioner: Daniel P. Hargrove
Respondent: State of GA and Sheriff Lablatt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hargrove v. Lablatt et al
as 1:2022cv00219
Petitioner: Daniel P. Hargrove
Respondent: Sheriff Lablatt, Judge Oliver, Gov. Kemp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HARGROVE v. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS et al
as 2:2020cv06584
Respondent: JUDGE SUSAN IRIS SCHULMAN, JUDGE ZACHARY C SHAFFER, JUDGE SCOTT DICLAUDIO and others
Petitioner: RAYMOND HARGROVE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hargrove v. Hamilton We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv01188
Respondent: Israel Hamilton
Petitioner: Jamiel M. Hargrove
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hargrove v. Mr. Bolster
as 3:2019cv00645
Respondent: Mr. Bolster
Petitioner: John E. Hargrove
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hargrove v. United States of America We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv00364
Respondent: United States of America
Petitioner: John E. Hargrove
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hargrove v. Key We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv00281
Petitioner: William Donald Hargrove
Respondent: James Key
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?