Cases 1 - 10 of 323
Heath v. Eller
as 2:2024cv02414
Petitioner:
William Heath
Respondent:
Warden Bryan Eller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lester v. DIRECTOR, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00413
Petitioner:
Timmy Heath Lester
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lester v. Lumpkin
as 5:2024cv00470
Petitioner:
Timmy Heath Lester
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Heath v. Rowe
as 2:2024cv00089
Petitioner:
Secial Heath
Defendant:
Larry Rowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Partlow v Chambers
as 4:2024cv00030
Petitioner:
Heath D. Partlow
Respondent:
Brian Chambers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Helvey v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Orange County)
as 6:2024cv00013
Petitioner:
Heath Lee Helvey
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brian Davis v. Randy Gibbs, et al
as 24-1014
Petitioner:
Brian Heath Davis
Respondent:
Randy Gibbs and Kris Karberg
Heath Zachary v. District Attorney Dauphin County, et al
as 23-3119
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HEATH ZACHARY
Defendant / Appellee:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY DAUPHIN COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Brian Davis v. Randy Gibbs, et al
as 23-2416
Petitioner / Appellant:
Brian Heath Davis
Respondent / Appellee:
Randy Gibbs and Kris Karberg
Heath v. NH State Prison for Men, Warden
as 1:2023fp00276
Petitioner:
Mark Heath
Respondent:
NH State Prison for Men, Warden
Not Classified By Court:
NH Department of Corrections - Notice Only - Habeas (Court Use Only) and NH Attorney General - Notice Only - Habeas (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
