Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Hamner v. State of Tennessee et al
as 2:2024cv02007
Petitioner:
Steffany Rose Hamner
Respondent:
State of Tennessee, Department of Children Services and Davidson County Juvenile Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Haywood v. Fulton County, GA Juvenile Court
as 1:2022cv04450
Petitioner:
Erica D. Haywood
Respondent:
Fulton County, GA Juvenile Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Willes v. Arizona Department of Child Safety et al
as 2:2019cv00068
Petitioner:
Arlena Minerva Willes
Respondent:
Maricopa County Juvenile Court and Arizona Department of Child Safety
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
B. et al v. State Of Ohio et al
as 2:2016cv00757
Petitioner:
C. M. B., Rachael N. Parks, r-Lotus Justice and others
Respondent:
State Of Ohio, Highland Count Job and Family Services, Highland County Sheriff Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Morgan Reece v. Jerry Powers
as 14-55143
Petitioner - Appellant:
MORGAN REECE, A Person Coming Under The Juvenile Court Law
Respondent - Appellee:
JERRY POWERS, Chief Probation Officer, Los Angeles County Probation Department
Futscher v. Pettis County Juvenile Court et al
as 2:2012cv04280
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Scott Futscher
Defendant:
Pettis County Juvenile Court, Pettis County Juvenile Office and Missouri Department of Social Services, Pettis County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Gardner et al v. Ute Indian Tribe et al
as 2:2012cv00210
Petitioner:
Edson Gardner, Lynda Kozlowicz and Konna C. Oviatt
Respondent:
Ute Indian Tribe, Ute Tribal Chairman, Ute Tribal Juvenile Court and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Fitzgerald v. Bellino et al
as 3:2010cv00667
Petitioner:
Darlene M. Fitzgerald
Respondent:
John Bellino, Cathy Stamets, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
