General Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 5,382
MCDOWELL v. BRITTAIN et al
as 2:2024cv02523
Petitioner: DARIUS MCDOWELL
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT K. BRITTAIN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cosby v. Banuelos, et al
as 24-1247
Petitioner: GREGORY D. COSBY, AKA Gregory D. Crosby
Respondent: M. BANUELOS, DHO Officer, A. CIOLLI, Warden, J. POTTER, Correctional Officer and others
Taylor a/k/a McCartney v. Arnott
as 6:2024cv03168
Petitioner: Taylor a/k/a Nigel S McCartney
Respondent: Jim Arnott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Paw v. Neely et al
as 7:2024cv00470
Petitioner: April Paw
Respondent: Warden K Neely and C Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cosby v. Ciolli, et al
as 24-1146
Petitioner: GREGORY D. COSBY, a/k/a Gregory D. Crosby
Respondent: A. CIOLLI, Warden, AW PROGRAMS COMPLEX, CMC COMPLEX and others
Ng v. Bennett
as 2:2024cv00717
Petitioner: Benjamin K Ng
Respondent: Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jacob Weld v. Melinda Braman
as 24-1449
Petitioner: JACOB JOHN WELD
Respondent: MELINDA K. BRAMAN, Warden
Phelps v. McCarthy We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv02381
Petitioner: Darryl Phelps
Respondent: Superintendent K. McCarthy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ezeah v. Heckard
as 5:2024hc02083
Petitioner: Ken Ejimofor Ezeah
Respondent: Warden K. Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ogden v. Turner, et al
as 24-2079
Petitioner: KEVIN K. OGDEN
Respondent: NEIL TURNER, Warden, GUADALUPE COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?