General Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 171
Lacy v. Villalobos, Jr.
as 4:2024cv00471
Petitioner: Antonio Maurice Lacy
Respondent: Moises Villalobos, Jr. and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lacy v. Commonwealth of Kentucky We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2024cv00065
Petitioner: Marvell Jermaine Lacy, Jr.
Respondent: Commonwealth of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lacy v. Pounds
as 2:2024cv00022
Petitioner: Anthony Lacy
Respondent: Zac Pounds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lacy v. Commonwealth of Kentucky
as 3:2024cv00044
Petitioner: Marvell Jermaine Lacy, Jr.
Respondent: Commonwealth of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Javonte Lacy v. Douglas Luneke
as 23-3769
Petitioner / Appellant: JAVONTE R. LACY
Respondent / Appellee: WARDEN DOUGLAS LUNEKE
Cobb v. United States
as 1:2023cv03849
Petitioner: Roy Lacy Cobb
Respondent: United States and Warden Sylvester L. Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Goggans v. Jamison We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv03645
Petitioner: Lacy Gene Goggans, Jr. and Lacy J. Goggans
Respondent: Warden J. L. Jamison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Swisher v. Lumpkin
as 23-50206
Petitioner / Appellant: Bryan Lacy Swisher
Respondent / Appellee: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
COBB v. WARDEN OF FCI LORETTO
as 3:2023cv00030
Petitioner: ROY LACY COBB
Respondent: WARDEN OF FCI LORETTO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Anthony Lacy v. Tony Mays
as 22-5916
Petitioner / Appellant: ANTHONY JOSEPH LACY
Respondent: TONY MAYS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?