Cases 1 - 10 of 46
MCCAULEY v. VANIHEL
as 2:2023cv00541
Petitioner:
JOSHUA MCCAULEY
Respondent:
FRANK VANIHEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Regassa v. Kimberley et al
as 1:2023cv01601
Petitioner:
Admassu Regassa
Respondent:
M Kimberley, E Johnson, V Moreno and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MCCAULEY v. WARDEN, FCI MCKEAN
as 1:2023cv00161
Petitioner:
BENJAMIN MICHAEL MCCAULEY
Respondent:
WARDEN, FCI MCKEAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Terrance A. McCauley v. Troy Knudson
as 23-1332
Petitioner / Appellant:
TERRANCE A. MCCAULEY
Respondent / Appellee:
TROY KNUDSON
Terrance McCauley v. Daniel Cromwell
as 23-1331
Petitioner / Appellant:
TERRANCE A. MCCAULEY
Respondent / Appellee:
DANIEL CROMWELL and DAN CROMWELL
McCauley, Terrance v. Knudson, Troy
as 3:2023cv00053
Petitioner:
Terrance A. McCauley and Terrance Arnez McCauley-Bey
Respondent:
Troy Knudson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McCauley, Terrance v. Cromwell, Daniel
as 3:2023cv00026
Petitioner:
Terrance A. McCauley and Terrance Arnez McCauley-Bey
Respondent:
Daniel Cromwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McMauley v. Fikes
as 2:2022cv00110
Petitioner:
Clay McCauley
Respondent:
Warden Jeffrey Fikes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
McCauley v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2022hc02161
Petitioner:
George McCauley
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McCauley, Terrance v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections
as 3:2022cv00474
Petitioner:
Terrance A. McCauley and Terrance Arnez McCauley-Bey
Respondent:
Wisconsin Department of Corrections
Not Classified By Court:
DCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
