Cases 1 - 10 of 14
McCurdy v. Lumpkin
as 22-10001
Petitioner / Appellant:
Tyrone Learone McCurdy
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
MCCURDY v. STATE OF MAINE
as 2:2019cv00511
Petitioner:
PRESCOTT MCCURDY
Respondent:
STATE OF MAINE
Not Yet Classified:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - HABEAS CASES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MCCURDY v. TICE et al
as 2:2017cv01443
Petitioner:
JOHN MCCURDY
Respondent:
ERIC TICE, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF LAWRENCE COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Marc McCurdy v. Brian Williams, et al
as 17-17238
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARC MCCURDY
Respondent - Appellee:
BRIAN WILLIAMS and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
McCurdy v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2016cv02669
Petitioner:
Tyrone Learone McCurdy
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McCurdy v. Davis
as 3:2016cv00570
Petitioner:
Glenn McCurdy
Respondent:
Ron Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McCurdy v. Davey
as 5:2016cv00696
Petitioner:
James C McCurdy
Respondent:
Dave Davey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McCurdy v. Williams et al
as 2:2014cv00713
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Brian Williams
Petitioner:
Marc McCurdy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
THE COMMONWEALTH v. MCCURDY et al
as 2:2007cv04367
Petitioner:
THE COMMONWEALTH
Respondent:
BOBBY MCCURDY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McCurdy v. Curry et al
as 4:2007cv05084
Petitioner:
Kenneth Donald McCurdy
Respondent:
Ben Curry and Jim Tilman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
