Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Lohmeier v. Eishen
as 0:2024cv00941
Defendant:
Mr JOHN HAROLD LOHMEIER, Pltf
Petitioner:
John H. Lohmeier
Respondent:
B. Eishen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
FREEMAN:MCLEARY v. HOUSER et al
as 2:2021cv05297
Petitioner:
MR. MICHAEL FREEMAN:MCLEARY
Respondent:
MR. MORRIS L. HOUSER, MR. JOHN SHAPIRO, MR. LAWRENCE KRASNER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stephens v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
as 3:2019cv00249
Petitioner:
Mr. John K Stephens and John K. Stephens
Respondent:
Mr. Tim Shoop and Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JOHNSON v. SMITH et al
as 3:2019cv00086
Respondent:
Mr. BARRY SMITH, Mr. JOSH SHAPRIO, PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION & PAROLE and others
Petitioner:
KALEEF JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Freitas v. Kobayashi
as 1:2019cv00203
Respondent:
Mr. Hiromichi Kobayashi
Petitioner:
Mr. John Ferdinand Freitas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
REED v. SMITH et al
as 3:2019cv00003
Petitioner:
JOHN REED
Respondent:
MR. BARRY SMITH, MR. JOSH SHAPIRO, CHAIRMAN OF THE PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION & PAROLE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Godinez v. Spivey et al
as 3:2018cv00074
Petitioner:
Ismael Lopez Godinez
Respondent:
Jeff Sessions, Mr. Jeh Johnson, Mr. Bill Spivey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lewallen v. Myrick
as 2:2014cv01816
Petitioner:
Marcus Angelo Lewallen
Respondent:
Mr John Myrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Larry Bailey v. John N. Natavinchi et al
as 2:2013cv04135
Petitioner:
Larry Bailey
Respondent:
District Court and Mr. John N. Natavinchi
Azucera Azuara-Navarette v. ICE Mr John Belangue et al
as 8:2013cv00643
Respondent:
ICE Mr John Belangue and Judge Lorrain J Munoz
Petitioner:
Azucera Azuara Navarette
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
