General Cases
Andrew T. Smith v. Jeff Siegel
as 23-2325
Petitioner / Appellant: ANDREW T. SMITH
Respondent / Appellee: JEFF SIEGEL, Sheriff, Elkhart County Corrections Center
Siegel v. Neuschmid et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv02493
Respondent: Xavier Becerra and Robert Neuschmid
Petitioner: Joshua Siegel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SIEGEL v. GIROUX et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00297
Respondent: NANCY GIROUX, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ERIE COUNTY
Petitioner: STEVEN SIEGEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Siegel v. T.D.C.J. Director We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2010cv00754
Petitioner: Nathan Dustin Heath Siegel
Respondent: T.D.C.J. Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Siegel v. T.D.C.J. Director
as 1:2010cv00080
Petitioner: Nathan Dustin Heath Siegel
Respondent: T.D.C.J. Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PALADINO v. ABRAHAM et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv05041
Petitioner: CHARLES T. PALADINO
Respondent: LYNN ABRAHAM, HUGH BURNS, SHEA RHODES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Siegel v. Yavapai County Superior Court et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2008cv08128
Petitioner: Richard Allan Siegel
Respondent: Yavapai County Superior Court and Arizona Attorney General, State of
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
PALADINO v. SIEGEL We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv01533
Petitioner: CHARLES T. PALADINO
Respondent: BERNARD L. SIEGEL
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Siegel v. Sabol
as 4:2007cv40219
Petitioner: Roger Siegel
Respondent: Carolyn Sabol
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?