Cases 1 - 10 of 81
Williams v. Fisher
as 3:2024cv00650
Petitioner:
Tommy Lee Williams
Respondent:
Raythel Fisher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Elijah Bankston v. State of Florida
as 0:2023cv62232
Plaintiff:
Tommy Lee and Elijah Bankston
Defendant:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Waldrip v. Warden
as 1:2023cv05140
Petitioner:
Tommy Lee Waldrip
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Collins v. Redington
as 2:2023cv00037
Petitioner:
Tommie Lee Collins
Respondent:
Dan Redington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Fisher
as 3:2023cv00423
Petitioner:
Tommy Lee Williams
Respondent:
Raythel Fisher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hightower v. The State of Texas
as 3:2023cv00440
Petitioner:
Tommy Lee Hightower, Jr.
Respondent:
The State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JONES v. MERENDINO
as 1:2023cv00089
Petitioner:
TOMMY LEE JONES
Respondent:
S. MERENDINO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Williams v. San Diego Sheriff's Department
as 3:2022cv00816
Petitioner:
Tommy Lee Williams
Respondent:
San Diego Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Fisher
as 3:2022cv00524
Petitioner:
Tommy Lee Williams
Respondent:
Raythel Fisher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McKinnon v. Baldwin et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2022cv00093
Plaintiff:
Tommy Lee McKinnon
Defendant:
Jeffery Baldwin, Steven T. Marshall and State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.