Cases 1 - 10 of 109
Travis Terry v. Frank Bishop
as 23-6959
Petitioner / Appellant:
TRAVIS DAVON TERRY
Respondent / Appellee:
FRANK BISHOP, Warden of North Branch Correctional Institution, VICKI BALLOU-WATTS, Judge, Baltimore County, ANNE MARIE GERRING, Public Defender and others
Vickie Duran v. Nevada, Division of Parole and Probation, et al
as 22-15613
Petitioner / Appellant:
VICKIE LEAVITT DURAN
Respondent / Appellee:
NEVADA, DIVISION OF PAROLE AND PROBATION and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Terry v. Frank Bishop et al
as 1:2022cv00046
Petitioner:
Travis Terry
Respondent:
Frank Bishop, Vicki Ballou-Watts, Anne Marie Gerring and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MONROE-RICKS v. UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS FOR D.C. et al
as 1:2021cv03061
Petitioner:
VICKY MONROE-RICKS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS FOR D.C. and DC SUPERIOR COURT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
PERRUCCI, JR. v. MOSER
as 3:2021cv00150
Petitioner:
ANGELO M. PERRUCCI, JR.
Respondent:
SCOTT FINLEY and WARDEN VICKY MOSER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Nickence v. Hoppe et al
as 3:2021cv00135
Plaintiff:
Ryan Joseph Nickence
Defendant:
Terrance Hoppe, Charles Brown, Vickie Sue McWaters and others
Respondent:
James Woodruff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Duran v. Nevada Divison of Parole and Probation et al
as 2:2021cv00582
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Nevada Divison of Parole and Probation
Petitioner:
Vickie Leavitt Duran
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CRUZ v. MOSER
as 3:2021cv00028
Respondent:
VICKIE MOSER
Petitioner:
RAUL CRUZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Woodard v. Genson
as 0:2021cv00483
Respondent:
Vicki Genson
Petitioner:
James Andre Woodard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
VALENTIN v. MOSER
as 3:2021cv00020
Respondent:
VICKIE MOSER
Petitioner:
ALFREDO VALENTIN, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
