Cases 201 - 210 of 4,560
Stephen Stanko v. Bryan Stirling
as 22-2
Petitioner / Appellant:
STEPHEN C. STANKO
Respondent / Appellee:
BRYAN P. STIRLING, Director, South Carolina Department of Corrections and MICHAEL STEPHAN, Warden, Broad River Correctional Institution
Paul Anthony Brown v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 22-11941
Petitioner / Appellant:
PAUL ANTHONY BROWN
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Lockhart v. Raybon et al (DEATH PENALTY)
as 3:2022cv00368
Plaintiff:
Courtney Lockhart
Defendant:
Terry Raybon and John Q. Hamm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alfredo Garcia v. David Shinn, et al
as 22-99007
Petitioner / Appellant:
ALFREDO LUCERO GARCIA
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director and RON CREDIO, Warden, Arizona State Prison - Eyman Complex
Harry Franklin Phillips v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 22-11606
Petitioner / Appellant:
HARRY FRANKLIN PHILLIPS
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Reynolds v. Dunn
as 4:2018cv00236
Respondent:
Jefferson S Dunn
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
John Anthony Esposito v. Warden GDP
as 22-11538
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN ANTHONY ESPOSITO
Respondent / Appellee:
GDCP WARDEN
Suniga v. TDCJ-CID Director
as 5:2022cv00124
Petitioner:
Brian Cliff Suniga
Respondent:
TDCJ-CID Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
McDonnell v. Fhuere
as 3:2022cv00909
Defendant:
Michael Martin McDonnell
Respondent:
Superintendent Corey Fhuere
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - Stay of Execution
Marvin Johnson v. David Bobby
as 22-3544
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARVIN G. JOHNSON
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID BOBBY, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
