Cases 71 - 80 of 81
Smith v. McDaniel et al
as 2:2007cv00318
Respondent:
E. K. McDaniel and Catherine Cortez Masto
Petitioner:
Joseph Weldon Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Greene v. McDaniel (DEATH PENALTY)
as 2:2007cv00304
Petitioner:
Travers A. Greene
Respondent:
Catherine Cortez Masto and E. K. McDaniel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Powell v. Kelly
as 1:2007cv00059
Petitioner:
Paul Warner Powell and Paul Warner Powell
Respondent:
Loretta K. Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Darick Walker v. Loretta Kelly
as 06-23
Petitioner - Appellant:
DARICK DEMORRIS WALKER
Respondent - Appellee:
LORETTA K. KELLY, Warden, Sussex I State Prison
Bell v. Kelly
as 06-22
Petitioner - Appellant:
EDWARD NATHANIEL BELL
Respondent - Appellee:
LORETTA K. KELLY, Warden, Sussex I State Prison
Owens v. Guida
as 05-6105
Petitioner - Appellant:
GAILE K. OWENS
Respondent - Appellee:
EARLINE GUIDA, Warden, TN Prison for Women
FOSTER v. MOORE, et al
as 5:2003cv00108
Petitioner:
CHARLES K FOSTER
Respondent:
MICHAEL W MOORE and CHARLIE CRIST
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BILLY RAY RILEY V. RENEE BAKER, ET AL.
as 3:2001cv00096
Respondent:
Frankie Sue Del Papa, E.K. McDaniel and Nevada State of
Unknown:
John M Warwick, IV, David K. Neidert, John M Warwick, IV and others
Petitioner:
Billy Ray Riley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Henness v. Bagley
as 2:2001cv00043
Petitioner:
Warren K Henness
Respondent:
Margaret A Bagley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mitcham v. Calderon, et al
as 5:1997cv03825
Petitioner:
Stephen Louis Mitcham
Respondent:
Jeanne Woodford , Jill Brown , Robert L. Ayers and others
Miscellaneou:
Habeas Corpus Resource Center and California Appellate Project
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
