Cases 1 - 10 of 4,566
AL-BAYYINAH v. JAMES
as 1:2024cv00465
Petitioner:
JATHIYAH A. AL-BAYYINAH
Respondent:
WARDEN JAMEL JAMES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Shepard v. Quick et al
as 5:2024cv00578
Petitioner:
Byron James Shepard
Respondent:
Christe Quick and Oklahoma State Penitentiary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Alfonso v. Titus
as 6:2024cv06341
Petitioner:
Santiago Alfonso
Respondent:
Superintendent A. Titus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Miller v. Marshall et al (DEATH PENALTY)
as 2:2024cv00197
Plaintiff:
Alan Eugene Miller
Defendant:
Steve Marshall, Kay Ivey, John Q. Hamm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jamie Mills v. Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections
as 24-11661
Petitioner:
JAMIE MILLS
Respondent:
COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Arthur Bomar v. Superintendent Greene SCI, et al
as 24-9001
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR BOMAR
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT GREENE SCI, SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI and SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Doty v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 3:2024cv00514
Petitioner:
Wayne C. Doty
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
John Koehler v. Secretary Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-9000
Plaintiff:
JOHN JOSEPH KOEHLER
Defendant:
SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SUPERINTENDENT GREENE SCI and SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI
IN RE: NATHAN HACK
as 2:2024cv02176
Plaintiff:
NATHAN HACK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Wexford Health Source et al
as 3:2024cv01013
Plaintiff:
Willie Robinson
Defendant:
Wexford Health Source, Rob Jeffries, Matthew Swalls and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
