Cases 11 - 20 of 37
Parson v. Miles et al
as 4:2017cv00708
Plaintiff:
Arnold Parson, Jr
Defendant:
Darren Miles, Buddy Collins, Elista H Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hines v. Rell et al
as 3:2013cv01516
Plaintiff:
Danny Lee Hines
Defendant:
Jodi Rell, Dan Malloy, James Dzurenda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Warner v. Patterson, et al
as 13-4026
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANNY LEE WARNER, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
TOM PATTERSON, Ex. director, for the Utah Department of Corrections, individually, SCOTT CARVER, former Ex. Director, for the Utah Department of Corrections, individually, STEVEN TURLEY, Warden at Utah State Prison, indivdually and others
Duffy v. Behrns et al
as 1:2012cv00036
Plaintiff:
Danny Lee Duffy, Sr
Defendant:
Robert L Behrns and Brad Livingston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Medaris v. Vaughn et al
as 4:2011cv03898
Plaintiff:
Danny Lee Medaris
Defendant:
Gregory M. Vaughn, Andres P. Mejorado and Vernon K. Pittman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Danny Perkins v. TDCJ - Correctional Inst Div, et al
as 11-10615
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANNY LEE PERKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE - CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MANAGED HEALTH CARE, TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY (CORRECTIONAL) MANAGED HEALTH CARE and others
Medaris v. Wynne Unit Law Library
as 4:2011cv02456
Plaintiff:
Danny Lee Medaris
Defendant:
Wynne Unit Law Library, Gregory M. Vaughn, Vernon K. Pittman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brewer v. Noble
as 3:2011cv00373
Plaintiff:
Danny Lee Brewer
Defendant:
(f/n/u) Noble
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brewer v. Rutherford County
as 3:2011cv00363
Plaintiff:
Danny Lee Brewer
Defendant:
Rutherford County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brewer v. Rutherford County
as 3:2011cv00198
Plaintiff:
Danny Lee Brewer
Defendant:
Rutherford County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
