Cases 11 - 20 of 52
McGriff El v. Centralize Infraction Bureau et al
as 5:2022ct03311
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Lee McGriff El
Defendant:
Centralize Infraction Bureau, North Carolina Superior Court, State of North Carolina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. County of Jefferson et al
as 9:2020cv01192
Plaintiff:
Mark James Brown, Sr.
Defendant:
County of Jefferson, Kory Keefer, Guilfoyle Ambulance Service, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fowler v. Keefer et al
as 3:2020cv00856
Defendant:
C/O Keefer, Internal Affairs Borwin, Supervisor Allsup and others
Plaintiff:
Peter Fowler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. County of Saratoga
as 18-1992
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Craig L. Johnson
Defendant - Appellee:
County of Saratoga, Michael H. Zurlo, Saratoga County Head Sherifff, Richard J. Emery, Colonel; Saratoga County Jail and others
Defendant:
John/Jane Does and Fine
Kevin Dickens v. Deputy Warden Klein, et al
as 17-2018
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN L. DICKENS
Defendant - Appellee:
COMM. CARL C. DANBERG, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER THOMAS CARROLL, BUREAU CHIEF RICK KEARNEY and others
Cunningham v. Keefer
as 6:2017cv00261
Plaintiff:
Travis Cunningham
Defendant:
Lonnie Keefer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cunningham v. Keefer
as 3:2016cv00453
Plaintiff:
Travis Scott Cunningham
Defendant:
Lonnie Keefer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cunningham v. Indiana State of et al
as 3:2016cv00396
Plaintiff:
Travis Cunningham
Defendant:
Lonnie Keefer, Corizon and Director of Classification
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randall v. Prime Care Medical Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00645
Plaintiff:
Ramsey Randall
Defendant:
Prime Care Medical Inc. and Ashley Keefer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Calvin Rouse v. Retreat SCI, et al
as 16-1127
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CALVIN ROUSE
Defendant - Appellee:
RETREAT SCI, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER KEEFER and C.O. SWEENEY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
