Cases 11 - 20 of 38
Priest III v. State Attorney et al
as 0:2017cv60756
Plaintiff:
Brandon Samuel Priest, III
Defendant:
State Attorney, Broward Sheriff Office, Starbucks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jeffrey Vickers v. Craig Dong, et al
as 16-17630
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY SCOTT VICKERS
Defendant - Appellee:
CRAIG E. DONG, CC 0215 Badge, WEST COBB DINER, PUBLIX and others
:
PUBLIX SUPER MARKETS, INC.
Smith v. State of Florida et al
as 8:2016cv03294
Plaintiff:
Vandall Marshall Smith
Defendant:
State of Florida, Walgreens Department Store and City of Tampa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cramer #124771 v. Walgreens Pharmacy
as 2:2016cv03208
Plaintiff:
David Cramer
Defendant:
Walgreens Pharmacy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vickers v. Dong et al
as 1:2016cv00026
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Scott Vickers
Defendant:
Craig E. Dong, West Cobb Diner, Publix and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
F v. Walgreen Co.
as 4:2015cv03711
Plaintiff:
T F
Defendant:
Walgreen Co.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vickers v. Dong et al
as 1:2015cv02469
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Scott Vickers
Defendant:
Craig E. Dong, J. J. Tumlin, Anthoney J. Polizzi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Mend Correctional Care et al
as 0:2015cv02848
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel W Moore
Defendant:
MEND Correctional Care, PA Longenfeld, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MUNSON v. THE WALGREEN DRUG STORE CHAIN CORP IN PHILA et al
as 2:2014cv06736
Plaintiff:
PAUL MUNSON
Defendant:
THE WALGREEN DRUG STORE CHAIN CORP IN PHILA, THE WALGREENS ON BROAD & SNYDER, THE WALGREENS ON 9TH MARKET STREET and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lucas v. Anderson et al
as 8:2014cv01448
Plaintiff:
Allen Drexel Lucas
Defendant:
M. Tyler Anderson, Ashley McMillan and Walgreens Drug Store #3093
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
