Civil Rights Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 19,852
Hasselmann v. Robinson et al
as 4:2024cv00188
Plaintiff: Charles Hasselmann
Defendant: Jamaras Robinson, Tony Williams, Lance Wignell and others
Interested Party: H. Loraine Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boman v. Zimmerman et al
as 6:2024cv06079
Plaintiff: Michael Dewaine Boman
Defendant: Parole Officer Zimmerman, Parole Officer Starky and John Doe Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abir Ali v. Esker Tatum
as 24-6527
Plaintiff: ABIR ALI
Defendant: ESKER TATUM, Warden and JOHN DOE
Kevin Giles v. Christopher Swanson, et al
as 24-1473
Plaintiff: KEVIN LA'VON GILES
Defendant: CHRISTOPHER R. SWANSON, Sheriff, KAY [UNKNOWN], Nurse, LIZ [UNKNOWN], Nurse and others
Garrison v. John Does and Jane Does Byrd Unit
as 4:2024cv02034
Plaintiff: Curtis Allen Garrison
Defendant: John Does and Jane Does Byrd Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fredricks v. May et al
as 9:2024cv00719
Plaintiff: Nigel Fredricks and Nigel Fredericks
Defendant: C. May and John Doe Correction Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garrison v. John Does and Janes Does Mark W. Michael Unit
as 6:2024cv00192
Plaintiff: Curtis Allen Garrison
Defendant: John Does and Janes Does Mark W. Michael Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garrison v. John Does and Janes Does, Coffield Unit
as 6:2024cv00193
Plaintiff: Curtis Allen Garrison
Defendant: John Does and Janes Does, Coffield Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garrison v. John Does and Jane Does French Robertson Unit
as 1:2024cv00081
Plaintiff: Curtis Allen Garrison
Defendant: John Does and Jane Does French Robertson Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WATSON v. DOE et al
as 5:2024cv00171
Plaintiff: TYRONE WATSON
Defendant: JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?