Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Henry Washington v. James Grace, et al
as 10-4434
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HENRY UNSELD WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES L. GRACE, DAVID J. WAKEFIELD, R. M. LAWLER and others
Tarpley v. Stouffer et al
as 1:2010cv02140
Plaintiff:
Steven E. Tarpley
Defendant:
J. Michael Stouffer, David Barthalow, Frederick J. Nastri and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Berryhill v. Henry, et al
as 10-7056
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAVERN BERRYHILL
Defendant - Appellee:
JARI ASKINS, Lieutenant Governor of Oklahoma, T. BASS-LESURE, Oklahoma County Judge, VIRGIL C. BLACK, Oklahoma County Judge and others
William Dunwoody v. D. B. Drew, et al
as 10-30519
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM THATCHER DUNWOODY
Defendant - Appellee:
T GARROW, SIS Lieutenant, M B WHITE, D.H.O. Officer, FREDERICK MENIFEE and others
Dabney v. Lapolt et al
as 9:2010cv00519
Plaintiff:
Bartram Yihni Dabney
Defendant:
Karen Lapolt, Lt. Zernetski, P. Besson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoban v. Harrington et al
as 1:2009cv01752
Plaintiff:
Timothy Hoban
Defendant:
K. Harrington, D Ortiz, L.L. Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dunwoody v. Drew et al
as 1:2009cv00937
Plaintiff:
William Thatcher Dunwoody
Defendant:
D B Drew, T Garrow and M B White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Dunwoody v. Drew et al
as 5:2009cv00222
Plaintiff:
William Thatcher Dunwoody
Defendant:
D. B. Drew, T. Garrow and M. B. White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Valdez v. Forte et al
as 1:2009cv00533
Plaintiff:
John Valdez
Defendant:
T. Forte, M. Gonder, E. Ramirez and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Shaka Muhammad v. V. Brumfield, et al
as 09-15148
Petitioner - Appellant:
SHAKA SENEGAL MUHAMMAD
Defendant - Appellee:
V. D. BRUMFIELD, M. B. MILES, ABUL RA'OOF NASIR and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
