Cases 21 - 30 of 41
Phillips v. Potter et al
as 3:2014cv01178
Plaintiff:
Fakeria Phillips
Defendant:
L Potter, Alama, Francis Fasciana and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Willard Talley v. Joseph Higgs, Jr.
as 14-6343
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLARD LEE TALLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH HIGGS, JR., Superintendent, L. T. NORRIS, Security, CLP CHEWING, Classification and others
Talley v. Judge Levy et al
as 1:2014cv00206
Plaintiff:
Willard Lee Talley
Defendant:
Judge Levy, Mrs. Guiffer and Steve Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blalock v. Fischer et al
as 9:2014cv00052
Plaintiff:
Maurice Blalock
Defendant:
Brian Fischer, Thomas LaValley, Steve Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Putnam v. Brown et al
as 1:2013cv02122
Defendant:
Grievance Coordinator Blythe, Steve Brown, Officer Cossette and others
Plaintiff:
Glen Alan Putnam
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Darrell Parks v. L. Ferguson, et al
as 13-55758
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRELL JAMES PARKS
Defendant - Appellee:
L. FERGUSON, Correctional Counselor, sued in Individual/Personal Capacity, TIMOTHY BAKER, Case Manager, sued in Individual/Personal Capacity, MARK TIPTON, Unit Manager, sued in Individual/Personal Capacity and others
Lebaron L Harris et al v. J Jackson et al
as 5:2013cv00649
Defendant:
Randall Bacon, Krista Bahre, B A Bledsoe and others
Plaintiff:
Lebaron L Harris
SHAW v. BROWN et al
as 1:2013cv02086
Plaintiff:
DON C. SHAW
Defendant:
STEVE BROWN and STATE TROOPER BARRACKS OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Darrell Parks v. L Ferguson et al
as 5:2013cv00470
Defendant:
Randall Bacon, Krista Bahre, Timothy Baker and others
Plaintiff:
Darrell Parks
Hill v. Bethea et al
as 3:2013cv00174
Plaintiff:
Howard L. Hill, II
Defendant:
D. Bethea, R. Danchise, G. Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
