Cases 31 - 40 of 55
Ross et al v. Aramark Corporation et al
as 1:2017cv07105
Plaintiff:
Christopher Ross, Kim Carl, Guillermo Fernandez and others
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation, Correctcare Solutions, County of Westchester and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barfell v. Aramark Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv00927
Plaintiff:
Thomas H L Barfell
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation, Winnebago County Jail and Correctional Healthcare Companies Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Booker v. Aramark Corporation et al
as 7:2017cv00074
Plaintiff:
Anthony Dewayne Booker
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation, Gross and Cynthia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Aramark Corporation et al
as 3:2017cv00777
Plaintiff:
Eddie Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation, f/n/u Christmas, James Hollaway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
March v. Aramark Corporation et al
as 3:2017cv00189
Plaintiff:
Perry Avram March
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation, Aramark Correction Services, LLC, Tennessee Department of Correction and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steven McClairn v. Aramark Corporation, et al
as 17-3341
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN MCCLAIRN
Defendant - Appellee:
ARAMARK CORPORATION and JANE/JOHN DOE
March v. Aramark Corporation et al
as 3:2017cv00253
Plaintiff:
Perry Avram March
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation, Aramark Correction Services, LLC, Tennessee Department of Correction and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILSON v. ARAMARK CORPORATION et al
as 1:2016cv00416
Defendant:
ARAMARK CORPORATION and QADIR ABDUL SHABAZZ
Plaintiff:
COURTNEY WILSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mills v. Aramark Correctional Services
as 1:2015cv00610
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation, John Holt and Aramark Employee Holt
Plaintiff:
Derrick Mills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bodman v. Aramark Corporation et al
as 2:2014cv14420
Plaintiff:
Chester Bodman
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation, Davre Davidson, Bob Marshall and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
