Cases 31 - 40 of 100
Aigbekaen v. Hurwitz et al
as 1:2020cv00341
Defendant:
E. Bradly, B.O.P. Director Hurwitz, Ayn Ducao and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond Aigbekaen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Tillman v. Huffman et al
as 1:2020cv00063
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Tillman
Defendant:
Warden C. Maruka, Unit Manager B. Huffman, Regional Director D. J. Harmon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Noe v. Matevousian et al
as 1:2019cv02148
Defendant:
Kelly, B.O.P., Sara M. Revell and others
Plaintiff:
Peter George Noe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 bv
Martinez v. Unknown B.O.P. Officials
as 1:2019cv01139
Defendant:
Unknown B.O.P. Officials
Plaintiff:
Ray Martinez and Raymond Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Due et al v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2019cv00019
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Ms. Stopher, Mrs. Yeager and others
Plaintiff:
Randall Due and Brent Swallers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MASSEY v. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT et al
as 1:2018cv00341
Plaintiff:
BRANDON MASSEY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, FEDERAL B.O.P. AGENCY and FEDERAL B.O.P. MEDICAL STAFF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COCHRAN-EL v. B.O.P. JOINT POLICY COMMITTEE MEMBERS et al
as 1:2018cv01028
Plaintiff:
LARRY COCHRAN-EL
Defendant:
B.O.P. JOINT POLICY COMMITTEE MEMBERS, CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., MARK S. INCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. U.S.A. et al
as 3:2018cv00200
Plaintiff:
Richie A. Hill
Defendant:
U.S.A., U.S.Government, B.O.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Massey v. United States Government et al
as 3:2017cv00744
Plaintiff:
Brandon Massey
Defendant:
United States Government, Federal B.O.P. Agency and Federal B.O.P. Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
McClain v. The B.O.P. et al
as 1:2017cv03269
Plaintiff:
Anthony McClain
Defendant:
The B.O.P. and Alan Petterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
