Cases 31 - 40 of 53
Patrick Howard v. A Davi
as 13-40677
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATRICK JAMES HOWARD
Defendant - Appellee:
A DAVIS, Subordinate
Washington v. Howard
as 6:2013cv00257
Plaintiff:
Anthony B. Washington
Defendant:
James Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. John Doe ESU #280 et al
as 1:2013cv03022
Interested Party:
Corporation Counsel For The City Of New York
Plaintiff:
James Howard
Defendant:
John Doe ESU #232 and John Doe ESU #280
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lemmons v. Houston et al
as 5:2013cv00494
Plaintiff:
Tobin Don Lemmons
Defendant:
Michael Houston, Jeff Troutt, Justin Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. Diaz et al
as 1:2013cv02746
Plaintiff:
James Howard
Defendant:
Jason Diaz, Moses Reyes and Umos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. Gensil et al
as 4:2013cv01015
Plaintiff:
Patrick James Howard
Defendant:
Cody Gensil, Wayne Brewer, John Flores and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pittman v. Charleston County Sheriff Department et al
as 2:2013cv00123
Plaintiff:
Devante A Pittman
Defendant:
Charleston County Sheriff Department , Christopher Davis , James Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Howard v. Davis et al
as 6:2012cv00913
Plaintiff:
Patrick James Howard
Defendant:
A. Davis, N Thigpen and J Brooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Howard v. Davis et al
as 9:2012cv00199
Plaintiff:
Patrick James Howard
Defendant:
A. Davis, N Thigpen and J Brooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harmon v. U.S. Prisoner Transports et al
as 3:2012cv00374
Defendant:
U.S. Prisoner Transports, James Berrong and Paul White
Plaintiff:
James Howard Harmon, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
