Civil Rights Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 43
Rochester v. Sanford et al
as 3:2011cv00471
Defendant: Abston, Nikkie Haley, Eric Holder and others
Plaintiff: Julian E. Rochester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mathis v. Dr. L. Wang et al
as 7:2010cv00476
Defendant: Dr. Bob Behnke, Dr. L. Dobransky, Dr. L. Wang and others
Plaintiff: Wayne K. Mathis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mathis v. Dr. L. Wang et al
as 1:2010cv01178
Plaintiff: Wayne K. Mathis
Defendant: Dr. L. Wang, Ms. C. Mayes, Dr. L. Dobransky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William White v. Ronald Fox, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-40843
Plaintiff - Appellant: WILLIAM DEXTER WHITE
Defendant - Appellee: RONALD FOX, D WOODS, Lieutenant, P JONES and others
Adler v. Sullivan et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv01269
Plaintiff: Brent Adler
Defendant: W. J. Sullivan, Fernando Gonzalez, Carrasco and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Bruce v. Reese et al
as 1:2009cv02378
Plaintiff: Antoine Bruce
Defendant: Constance Reese, Becky Clay, J. Savidge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kefauver v. The City of York Pennsylvania et al
as 1:2009cv02159
Plaintiff: Michael E. Kefauver
Defendant: The City of York Pennsylvania, John S. Brenner, Dana Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986 Neglect of Duty
Ardell Jones v. Timothy Brunsman, et al
as 09-3986
Plaintiff - Appellant: ARDELL P. JONES
Defendant - Appellee: TIMOTHY BRUNSMAN, Warden (Former), OFFICER CURTIS, LT. MCKEE and others
Ford v. Morris et al
as 4:2008cv00796
Plaintiff: Henry Lee Ford, III
Defendant: Lieutenant Morris, C OBrian, D Wise and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jones v. Swann et al
as 5:2008cv03072
Plaintiff: Gary P Jones, Sr
Defendant: M Swann, G Drennan, J Hollingsworth and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?