Cases 41 - 50 of 19,841
Mendez v. The New Mexico Corrections Department et al
as 2:2024cv00517
Plaintiff:
Mario A Mendez
Defendant:
The New Mexico Corrections Department, Geo Inc. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alfonso v. Travis et al
as 6:2024cv06324
Plaintiff:
Ramon M. Alfonso
Defendant:
Michael Travis, Patrick McCann, Correction Officer Jeremy Comfort and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pickett v. Doe et al
as 1:2024cv00190
Plaintiff:
Freddie Monroe Pickett
Defendant:
John Doe, Jane Doe and Securus Technologies
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pickett v. Doe et al
as 1:2024cv00192
Plaintiff:
Freddie Monroe Pickett
Defendant:
John Doe, Jane Doe and Securus Technologies
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lawson v. Lamont et al
as 3:2024cv00917
Plaintiff:
Jeremy M. Lawson
Defendant:
Ned Lamont, William Tong, Matt Pitter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Albert Anderson v. McMillian
as 24-6495
Plaintiff:
ALBERT ANDERSON
Defendant:
MCMILLIAN, Medical Provider, ERIC DYE, Warden, JEFFREY DUNCAN, Assistant Warden and others
Henry v. Magill et al
as 4:2024cv01946
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Brandon-Keith Henry
Defendant:
A.D.A Matthew Magill, A.D.A. Jane Doe #1, A.D.A John Doe / Jane Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flohr v. Jeff Siegel et al
as 3:2024cv00415
Defendant:
ROBERT FLOHR, Elkhart County Sheriff Jeff Siegel, John Does/Jane Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Frisina et al
as 9:2024cv00697
Plaintiff:
Robert Williams
Defendant:
D. Frisina, S. Jackson, Phil Melecio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Doe
as 5:2024cv00709
Plaintiff:
Jay Williams
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
