Cases 41 - 50 of 95
Jamie Miller v. County of Choctaw, et al
as 15-60323
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMIE L. MILLER
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF CHOCTAW, CLOYD HALFORD, Sheriff, Choctaw Sheriff Department and PEGGY R. MILLER, Choctaw Sheriff Department
Griffin v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2015cv00577
Plaintiff:
Matthew James Griffin
Defendant:
Gonzales, Hill, R. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Holtzapple et al
as 3:2015cv00711
Plaintiff:
Derrick Lakeith Brown
Defendant:
Scott Holtzapple, J. Butler, B. Trate and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Adrian King, Jr. v. Jim Rubenstein
as 15-6382
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ADRIAN F. KING, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
JIM RUBENSTEIN, Commissioner, MARVIN C. PLUMLEY, Warden, DIANNE R. MILLER, Associate Warden Programs/Housing and others
Miller v. County of Choctaw et al
as 1:2015cv00042
Plaintiff:
Jamie L. Miller
Defendant:
County of Choctaw, Cloyd Halford and Peggy R. Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. County of Choctaw et al
as 1:2015cv00014
Plaintiff:
Jamie L. Miller
Defendant:
County of Choctaw, Cloyd Halford and Peggy R. Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PONCE-HURTADO v. ELDRIDGE et al
as 1:2014cv02029
Plaintiff:
GONZALO PONCE-HURTADO
Defendant:
CONNER ELDRIDGE, BRENDOM CARTER, ERIN SETSER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Rubenstein et al
as 3:2014cv00042
Plaintiff:
Adrian F. King, Jr.
Defendant:
Jim Rubenstein , Marvin C. Plumley , Dianne R. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Rubenstein et al
as 2:2014cv14537
Plaintiff:
Adrian F. King, Jr.
Defendant:
Jim Rubenstein , Marvin C. Plumley , Dianne R. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Admire et al
as 1:2013cv03000
Plaintiff:
Toratio Deval Williams
Defendant:
Admire, Motern, B. Garman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
