Cases 41 - 50 of 54
Robert Davis v. Mark Parker, et al
as 11-1824
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Robert Davis
Defendant - Appellee:
Mark Parker, CO-1, Paula Phillips, FUM, John Hilpert, CCW-1 and others
Davis et al v. Parker et al
as 1:2011cv00030
Plaintiff:
Robert Davis
Defendant:
Mark Parker, Paula Phillips, John Hilpert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bradley et al v. Mason et al
as 1:2011cv00017
Plaintiff:
James Bradley and Robert Davis
Defendant:
William D. Mason, Ronald L. Shobert and Bob Reid
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Irizarry v. Corknard et al
as 9:2010cv01022
Plaintiff:
Christopher Irizarry
Defendant:
S. Corknard, Robert Davies, III, Dixon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moran-Dopico #630967 v. Davis et al
as 2:2010cv00052
Plaintiff:
Hugo Moran-Dopico #630967
Defendant:
Robert Davis, Roger See and Missouri, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moran-Dopico #630967 v. Davis et al
as 1:2010cv00803
Plaintiff:
Hugo Moran-Dopico #630967
Defendant:
Robert Davis, Roger See and Missouri, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abbott v. Oller et al
as 2:2010cv00032
Plaintiff:
Jay Abbott
Defendant:
Matthew W. Oller, Robert Davis, Charles Meador and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID et al
as 3:2010cv00282
Plaintiff:
Robert Davis
Defendant:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID, E Wheeler, C Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Shelby County Detention Facility et al
as 2:2009cv02480
Plaintiff:
Robert Davis
Defendant:
Shelby County Detention Facility and City of Memphis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fred Reeves, Jr. v. Deborah Wallington, et al
as 09-1751
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRED DANIEL REEVES, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
DEBORAH WALLINGTON, DAVID SIVIK, KAREN KEDRON, Correctional Officer and others
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 1-6
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
