Cases 51 - 60 of 172
Young v. Tymkovich et al
as 1:2018cv02530
Defendant:
Timothy Tymkovich, United States, Boyd Boland and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Doyle Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Sessions et al
as 1:2018cv02434
Defendant:
United States, US Attorney, Southern District Ohio, Department of Justice and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Doyle Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barber v. Meirose et al
as 5:2018cv05063
Defendant:
Dalton Santana, Timothy Doyle, Anthony Meirose and others
Plaintiff:
Blake Barber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Sessions et al
as 3:2018cv05234
Defendant:
U.S. Attorney General, United States, Department of Justice and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Doyle Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Sessions
as 1:2018cv07880
Plaintiff:
Timothy Doyle Young
Defendant:
Jeff Sessions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Revell et al
as 5:2018cv03215
Defendant:
Department of Justice and Sara Revell
Plaintiff:
Timothy Doyle Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Timothy Young v. Jefferson Sessions, III, et al
as 18-35679
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY DOYLE YOUNG
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, JUDICIAL CONFERENCE COMMITTEE and others
Young v. Sessions et al
as 1:2018cv11633
Plaintiff:
Timothy Doyle Young
Defendant:
Department of Justice Judicial Council United States and Jeff Sessions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Sessions et al
as 4:2018cv01293
Defendant:
Judicial Council, United States Department of Justice, Jeff Sessions and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Doyle Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. United States Department of Justice
as 2:2018cv07371
Plaintiff:
Timothy Doyle Young
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
