Cases 61 - 70 of 588
Tunsil v. Laurel et al
as 1:2023cv01288
Plaintiff:
Barrett S. Tunsil
Defendant:
Harry Laurel, WellPath, Inc, Pennsylvania Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRIBSCHAW v. HARRY et al
as 2:2023cv02987
Plaintiff:
DAVID GRIBSCHAW
Defendant:
LAUREL HARRY, TAMMY FERGUSON, ANN VERYYALA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christian Owens v. Deb, et al
as 23-2361
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTIAN OWENS
Defendant / Appellee:
DEB, Kitchen Aide/Summit FOods FCJ, KERRY, TIFFANY, Kitchen Aide/Summit Foods FCJ and others
Bechtol v. Carter County et al
as 6:2023cv00254
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Edward Bechtol
Defendant:
Carter County, Chris Bryant, Harvey Burkhart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dixon v. Trousdale Turner Correctional Center et al
as 3:2023cv00781
Plaintiff:
David Howard Dixon
Defendant:
Trousdale Turner Correctional Center, Tiffany Robertson, f/n/u Gayther and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morrison v. Crayton
as 4:2023cv02494
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Morrison
Defendant:
Roy Leslie Crayton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NOVAK v. CALDWELL et al
as 1:2023cv03648
Plaintiff:
KENNETH R. NOVAK
Defendant:
EUGENE CALDWELL, II and NURSE TIFFANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Warden Carter C et al
as 1:2023cv05234
Plaintiff:
Ralph Thompson
Defendant:
Warden Carter C, A.D.W. Cappelle, Soloman Chester and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Counts v. Wasko et al
as 4:2023cv04103
Defendant:
GTL Technology, Kellie Wasko, Brent Fluke and others
Plaintiff:
David L Counts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Morrison v. Crayton
as 4:2023cv02445
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Morrison
Defendant:
Roy Leslie Crayton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
