Cases 81 - 90 of 1,580
Nadya Diaz v. Adam Hames, et al
as 23-11209
Petitioner / Appellant:
NADYA IVETTE DIAZ
Respondent / Appellee:
ADAM MARSHALL HAMES, MATTHEW KYLE WINCHESTER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA and others
Diaz-Diaz v. Linnimeier et al
as 1:2023cv00134
Plaintiff:
Jennifer L. Diaz-Diaz
Defendant:
Mildred Linnimeier and Allen County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cater v King County et al
as 2:2023cv00451
Plaintiff:
Halfred Cater
Defendant:
King County, King County Adult Corrections Department, Faauma and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shabazz v. Boston Medical Center et al
as 1:2023cv10624
Plaintiff:
Jalonni Shabazz
Defendant:
Boston Medical Center, Yohanis Anglero Diaz, Bediha Ipekci and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diaz v. Akinyele et al
as 3:2023cv00236
Plaintiff:
Luis Diaz
Defendant:
Emmanuel Akinyele and Frank Strada
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. St Joseph County et al
as 3:2023cv00211
Estate Plaintiff:
Brittany Anderson
Defendant:
St Joseph County, Sheriff William Redman, Warden Julienne Lawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PC) McClinton v. St. Andre et al
as 2:2023cv00379
Plaintiff:
Andre Kaefunn McClinton
Defendant:
Robert Andre, Howard E. Mosely, T. Thor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burke v. Diaz
as 23-20074
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Andrew Burke
Defendant / Appellee:
Mike Diaz, Attorney
(PC) Sherman v. Ortiz-Diaz
as 1:2023cv00289
Plaintiff:
Stanley Sherman
Defendant:
A Oritiz-Diaz and A. Ortiz-Diaz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGraw v. Doe et al
as 3:2023cv00229
Plaintiff:
Keith McGraw
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Diaz and Long
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
