Cases 81 - 90 of 103
Terry Wilson v. Office of the United States At
as 10-2082
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERRY L. WILSON
Defendant - Appellee:
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Thomas v. Wilson et al
as 8:2010cv02003
Plaintiff:
Titus Thomas
Defendant:
G. L. Wilson, D. Krampt, R. Allison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Obama v. Hobbs, Interim Director, Arkansas Department of Correction et al
as 6:2010cv06054
Plaintiff:
Ishmael Hassan Obama
Defendant:
Ray Hobbs, Interim Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Gaylon Lay, Michael Moseley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Obama v. Hobbs, Interim Director, Arkansas Department of Correction et al
as 1:2010cv06054
Plaintiff:
Ishmael Hassan Obama
Defendant:
Ray Hobbs, Interim Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Gaylon Lay, Michael Moseley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. United States
as 1:2010cv01148
Petitioner:
Torell L. Wilson
Respondent:
United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knauer et al v. Fackler et al
as 3:2010cv00415
Plaintiff:
Nickolas S. Knauer and David L. Wilson
Defendant:
Danny Fackler, Martha Knox, Donna Bullock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Ober et al
as 8:2010cv00992
Plaintiff:
Andrew L. Wilson, III
Defendant:
Mark Ober, Kristin Serafin and John or Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fulsom v. Workman et al
as 6:2010cv00129
Plaintiff:
Najee M. Fulsom
Defendant:
Randy Workman, L. Wilson, Hawk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Terry Wilson v. Oakland County Prosecutor's Of
as 09-2292
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERRY L. WILSON
Defendant - Appellee:
OAKLAND COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE
WILSON v. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD et al
as 3:2009cv04432
Plaintiff:
KENNETH L. WILSON
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD and RUBY J. WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
