Cases 1 - 10 of 58
Mikanda v. McNeely
as 1:2023cv08169
Plaintiff:
Neyembo Mikanda
Defendant:
Chief of Police Antje McNeely
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anders v. Haug et al
as 7:2023cv00434
Plaintiff:
Jason Anders
Defendant:
Chief Kimberly Haug, Major D. O'Dell, Captain McNeely and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner et al v. Haug et al
as 7:2023cv00322
Plaintiff:
Dereck Ray Turner and Jason Anders
Defendant:
Chief Kimberly Haug, Major D. O'Dell, Captain McNealy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McNeely v. Genesee County Jail et al
as 2:2022cv11788
Plaintiff:
Antoine McNeely
Defendant:
Genesee County Jail, Thornton, Depalma and others
Epps v. Anderson County Sheriff's Office et al
as 8:2022cv00934
Plaintiff:
Paula Epps
Defendant:
Anderson County Sheriff's Office and Daniel McNeely
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
James Rose, Jr. v. State of South Carolina
as 22-6218
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES EDWARD ROSE, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, BERKELEY COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, HILL-FINKLEA DETENTION CENTER and others
BULLARD v. CARNEY et al
as 2:2021cv05158
Plaintiff:
JAMES BULLARD
Defendant:
BLANCHE CARNEY, MICHELLE FARRELL, DEPUTY WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rose v. State of South Carolina et al
as 2:2021cv02909
Plaintiff:
James Edward Rose, Jr
Defendant:
State of South Carolina, Berkeley County Sheriff's Office, Hill-Finklea Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Forter et al v. Brown et al
as 6:2021cv00478
Plaintiff:
Jacob Phillips, Joseph J. Gustin, III, Jack Caudy and others
Defendant:
Colette S. Peters and Governor Kate Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) McNeely v. Reyes
as 2:2020cv02551
Plaintiff:
Rufus McNeely
Defendant:
E. Reyes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
