Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Conner v. Doe et al
as 1:2021cv00366
Defendant:
James E. Parks, Nikita B. Murphy, K. Breeding and others
Plaintiff:
Reginald T. Conner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Christian v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2021cv00305
Defendant:
E Nze, R Ablog, L Kaiser and others
Plaintiff:
Earl Dean Christian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCALLISTER v. WINSTON-SALEM POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2019cv00013
Defendant:
SGT D. T. LENTZ, CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM, T. N. BRANCH and others
Plaintiff:
ANTON THURMAN MCALLISTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCALLISTER v. WINSTON-SALEM POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2018cv00745
Defendant:
RICHARD GOTTLIEB, SGT D. T. LENTZ, ELISABETH FROST DRESEL and others
Plaintiff:
ANTON THURMAN MCALLISTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dominquez v. Schneiderman et al
as 6:2016cv06292
Plaintiff:
Ralph Dominquez
Defendant:
Eric T. Schneiderman, Peter H. Schiff, Marcus J. Mastracco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wanzer v. Kotzur et al
as 5:2015cv01164
Defendant:
E. Alaniz, Jr., D. A. Brown, P. Chapa and others
Plaintiff:
Jerry Wanzer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Parks et al
as 1:2013cv00823
Plaintiff:
Chauncey A. Williams
Defendant:
J. E. Parks, M. L. Taylor, D. B. Everett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Mitchell et al
as 4:2012cv01454
Plaintiff:
Shyheem Lee Smith
Defendant:
M M Mitchell, L. Rosario and R. Blocker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Mitchell et al
as 3:2010cv03044
Plaintiff:
Charmaine Smith
Defendant:
M M Mitchell, K Vining, Ballesteg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Stine et al
as 5:2010cv00284
Plaintiff:
Shyheem Lee Smith
Defendant:
D. L. Stine, M. M. Mitchell, L. Gregorey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
