Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Smith v. Chesterfield VA Sheriff Department et al
as 1:2023cv01211
Plaintiff:
Roy Mandell Smith
Defendant:
Chesterfield VA Sheriff Department, Kevin Connolly, Aaron Kirk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ball v. United States of America et al
as 7:2020cv00558
Plaintiff:
Carlos Diaz, Frank Anthony Diaz-Navarro, Matthew Penaloza and others
Defendant:
B. Parson, B. Parker, D. Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Penaloza v. Streeval et al
as 7:2020cv00485
Defendant:
Officer Brooks, Lieutenant Childers, C. Wright and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew A. Penaloza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Terrell v. Stubbe et al
as 9:2020cv00105
Defendant:
Weston Stubbe, Sean Burks, B. Parker and others
Plaintiff:
Sheron Gabriel Terrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STOKES v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 7:2019cv00165
Defendant:
BETH C GREENE, JONI B PARKER, ELIZABETH CHESSER CLEVELAND and others
Plaintiff:
DESMOND LAMONT STOKES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. Board of County Commissioners of Tulsa County et al
as 4:2018cv00671
Defendant:
David B Parker, Board of County Commissioners of Tulsa County and Vic Regalado
Plaintiff:
James Michael Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mukes v. State of Tennessee et al
as 2:2018cv02555
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Trent Hall, Leon Jose and others
Plaintiff:
Marquette D. Mukes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jerome Randle v. J. Sloan, et al
as 18-40810
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEROME RANDLE
Defendant - Appellee:
J. SLOAN, NORRIS JACKSON, JEFFREY CATOE and others
Moses Smith, Jr. v. William Stephens, et al
as 17-40928
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MOSES SMITH, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN WILLIAM STEPHENS, B. PARKER, GARY HUNTER and others
Randle v. Sloan et al
as 6:2017cv00459
Plaintiff:
Jerome Randle
Defendant:
J Sloan, Norris Jackson, Jeffrey Catoe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
