Cases 1 - 10 of 80
Guy v. Bundy
as 4:2023cv00031
Plaintiff:
Bennie David Guy
Defendant:
Warden B Bundy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Guy v. Bundy
as 6:2023cv00423
Plaintiff:
Bennie David Guy
Defendant:
Warden B Bundy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas et al v. Luth et al
as 2:2023cv01405
Plaintiff:
Prentice Ray Thomas and Edith Bundy
Defendant:
Darrell Luth and Didn't Do It Bail Bonds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jonathan Slaikeu v. Alaska Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-35120
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JONATHAN A. SLAIKEU
Defendant / Appellee:
ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, HAMILTON, First Name Unknown; Sergeant, BUNDY, First Name Unknown; CO and others
Slaikeu v. Alaska Dept. of Corrections et al
as 3:2022cv00188
Plaintiff:
Jonathan A. Slaikeu
Defendant:
Alaska Dept. of Corrections, Hamlton, Bundy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LaCroix v. Holcomb et al
as 3:2022cv00193
Defendant:
DeAngelo Dove, Christopher Erwing, Brandon French and others
Plaintiff:
Terry LaCroix and Terry Lynn LaCroix
Not Classified By Court:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BUNDY v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY et al
as 1:2021cv20259
Plaintiff:
NICHOLE BUNDY
Defendant:
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, CUMBERLAND COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, RYAN AUBEROWSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BUNDY v. SALEM CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT
as 1:2021cv20194
Plaintiff:
JAMES BUNDY
Defendant:
SALEM CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rose v. Chavez et al
as 1:2021cv00102
Defendant:
FNU Chavez, FNU Ruse, FNU Hammond and others
Plaintiff:
Bennie Lee Rose
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meador v. Lumpkin et al
as 1:2021cv00070
Defendant:
Governor Greg Abbott, Bryan Collier, Benny Bundy and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dale Meador
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
