Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Saunders v. Aramark workers et al
as 3:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
Quantel Omek Saunders
Defendant:
Aramark workers, Aramark supervisors, Capt. Hinchman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Greene v. Justice et al
as 5:2021cv00163
Plaintiff:
Michael Jermaine Greene
Defendant:
Randolph County, Jim Justice, Betsy C. Jividen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Greene v. Feaster et al
as 5:2021cv00140
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Greene
Defendant:
Sidney Feaster, Governor Jim Justice, Randolph County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Greene v. Plumley et al
as 3:2019cv00102
Defendant:
Kenneth Wingfield, Andrew Hinchman, Timmy Cutright and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Jermaine Greene
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Greene v. Plumley et al
as 3:2018cv00108
Defendant:
Sergeant Justin Close, Richard Gisell, Sergeant Kenneth Wingfield and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Jermaine Greene
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Usher v. Lochard et al
as 2:2018cv02122
Plaintiff:
Larry Usher
Defendant:
H Lochard, Mary Miller, Sherry Benton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRUND v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 1:2016cv00096
Defendant:
CORIZON, DAVID HINCHMAN, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION and others
Plaintiff:
SUSAN GRUND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eric L Porter v. Los Angeles County et al
as 2:2015cv05646
Defendant:
Lee Baca, Bleau, Bravo and others
Plaintiff:
Eric L Porter
Joseph Wood v. Jim Rubenstein
as 15-6014
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH WILLIAM WOOD
Defendant - Appellee:
JIM RUBENSTEIN, MARVIN C. PLUMLEY, THOMAS HARLAN, Capt. and others
Defendant:
NURSE, on Duty July 31, 2012 (P.M. Shift, Name unknown), TRISTEN TENNEY and WEXFORD MEDICAL SOURCES
Donovan L. Haley v. LASD et al
as 2:2014cv03944
Defendant:
Brown, Deputy Brown, Doe 1 and others
Plaintiff:
Donovan L Haley
Los Angeles Sheriffs Department:
LASD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
