Cases 1 - 10 of 111
John Alexander v. B. Myers, et al
as 24-1239
Plaintiff:
JOHN ALEXANDER
Defendant:
B. MYERS, Corrections Lieutenant- SCI Smithfield, SPECK, Corrections Lieutenant SCI-Smithfield, WISER, Corrections Lieutenant SCI-Smithfield and others
Morris v. Taylor et al
as 2:2024cv02024
Plaintiff:
Henry Morris
Defendant:
Daniel J. Taylor and Spragins, Barnett, Cobb & Butler, Law Firm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dunbar v. Darrett et al
as 5:2023cv00906
Plaintiff:
Eddie Dunbar
Defendant:
G. Darrett, J. Frawley, K. Gilser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Dunbar v. Darrett et al
as 2:2023cv00299
Plaintiff:
Eddie Dunbar
Defendant:
G. Darrett, J. Frawley, K. Gilser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Teodosio et al
as 5:2023cv00124
Plaintiff:
Jackie J. Taylor
Defendant:
Thomas A. Teodosio, Sherri Bevan Walsh and Walter T. Madison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy to Interfere with Civil Rights
Tidwell v. Taylor et al
as 1:2022cv06537
Plaintiff:
Cleother Tidwell
Defendant:
Bradley J. Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawkins v. Neau et al
as 4:2022cv05120
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Brooks Hawkins
Defendant:
Jonathan Neau, Timothy J Taylor, Kenneth G Jennings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Fudge v. Bret Bennett, et al
as 22-35723
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES CHARLES FUDGE
Defendant / Appellee:
BRET BENNETT, NANCY ARMSTRONG, JEREMY BEAUMONT and others
James Fudge v. Bret Bennett, et al
as 22-35708
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES CHARLES FUDGE
Defendant / Appellee:
BRET BENNETT, NANCY ARMSTRONG, JEREMY BEAUMONT and others
Alexander v. Myers et al
as 3:2022cv01195
Plaintiff:
John Alexander
Defendant:
B. Myers, E. Speck, D. Wiser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
